On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:21, jer...@jeromebaum.com said: > Just so that Werner has a summary of what we've discussed, to base a > decision on.
Thanks for that summary. What I miss is a real use case for it. Is there someone implementing a general purpose time stamping service? IIRC, there used to be some 10 years or more ago. Still any? I don't know. How if that is the case, please go ahead, implement it using whatever notation you like and get that service running. gpgme has the features to display such notations, thus you can easily write a check-timestamp application for your service. How if that service is in real use, it might be the time to see whether it is worth an I-D or whether GPG should understand such an notation if - then - marked critical. We have way too many features in OpenPGP and GPG with the majority of them not being used. Adding a yet another new feature should only be done if there is real world need for it. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
