Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2011, 23:23:34 schrieb MFPA: > Hi > > > On Thursday 16 June 2011 at 3:27:12 PM, in > <mid:201106161627.13391.mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de>, Hauke Laging > > wrote: > > If anyone is not happy with the OpenPGP timestamp > > format (which I haven't noticed yet) > > Then I refer you to two postings from Amano Corunga > Message-id <20110608153652.4f1508c...@nym.dizum.nl> and > Message-id <20110616002944.974948c...@nym.dizum.nl> > which refer to a requirement to be able to create signatures without > revealing (possibly sensitive) information about the signer's time > management.
To me that is quite clear not a problem of the FORMAT of the timestamp. Hauke -- PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
