On Jun 15, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Hauke Laging wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, 21:10:45 schrieb David Shaw:
>> and are not well specified (0x40 sigclass - is it a binary >> signature? a text signature?). > > How is this a problem? Does it matter for that purpose (or any other) how a > signature is encoded (does "text signature" mean --armor?)? It matters for text input. That's why there are actually two different forms of data signature: 0x00 for data, and 0x01 for text where line endings are canonicalized. This is so a signed text message created on one platform is verifiable on a different platform with different line endings. There is only one 0x40, so it's either data or text, but cannot be both. David _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
