Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, 03:16:16 schrieb Jerome Baum: > So, um, let's just start using a non-standardized notation in the "@" > namespace and then wait for standardization?
A good procedure. > We just need to agree on > a name, maybe Werner can confirm we are free to use > "timestamp-o...@gnupg.org"? What would the value mean? Shall I repeat the proposal, or is that a question to Werner? :-) "The signer makes no statement about the content of the signed data (may not even have been able to read it) but only confirms its existance at the time of the given timestamp." Hauke -- PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
