>>> Out of curiosity, as long as we're talking about things that current code >>> will reject, does the 0x50 signature meet the semantics desired here? This >>> all sounds vaguely notary-like ("I saw this document on such-and-such >>> date") to me, and the intent of 0x50 is a notary signature. The nice thing >>> about a 0x50 signature is that it is a signature on a signature, so the >>> timestamp service doesn't need to see the document - just the (detached) >>> signature. >> >> My understanding of a notary's job would include "I trust this key to >> be valid, in possession only of the person named in the uid, while >> that person was in sufficient mental state, not being threatened at >> gun-point, ..." > > The 0x50 signature should not be interpreted as the output of a real-world > notary
Who says that? > OpenPGP calls this signature a "Third-Party Confirmation signature". It is > merely a signature on a signature for whatever purpose is desired by the > signer. So, is it interpretation-dependent? >> -- why should we use a signature type that could be >> misinterpreted, when there is a "timestamp" signature type that fits >> our needs exactly? > > Because as already noted, the 0x40 signature is not fully specified in the > standard. There is not enough information to know how to generate one. Looking at <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880>: 1. Referring to 0x50: "It is analogous to a notary seal on the signed data." -- see my problem with that above. 2. If the issue is "text vs. binary", § 5.2.1 ("Signature Types") seems to suggest all signatures besides 0x01 are binary. 3. If the issue is "what do we sign (data vs. another signature)?", I would say it depends what you're trying to do: Are you asserting that you saw the signature, or are you asserting that you saw the data? -- Jerome Baum tel +49-1578-8434336 email jer...@jeromebaum.com web www.jeromebaum.com -- PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users