On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:33:33 +0000, Jerome Baum <jer...@jeromebaum.com> wrote: > So you're admitting there exists a reason not to use RSA-2048?
I've never said there is *no* reason to ever go past RSA-2048. There clearly are special cases where more is necessary. However, for the overwhelming majority of users I see no reason to go past RSA-2048. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users