On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:33:33 +0000, Jerome Baum <jer...@jeromebaum.com>
wrote:
> So you're admitting there exists a reason not to use RSA-2048?

I've never said there is *no* reason to ever go past RSA-2048.  There
clearly are special cases where more is necessary.  However, for the
overwhelming majority of users I see no reason to go past RSA-2048.


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to