On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:11:37 +0000, Jerome Baum <jer...@jeromebaum.com> wrote: > Okay so let's try again. Correct me if I'm wrong on this one, but it > does make your key weaker _compared with using an algorithm that > supports 512 bits of hash, all else being equal_, right?
If such an algorithm existed in GnuPG, then yes. You'd need about RSA-16K to get your money's worth out of SHA512, though. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
