On 2/26/11 9:24 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote: > http://josefsson.org/inline-openpgp-considered-harmful.html
* IT DOESN'T HANDLE ATTACHMENTS. That's fine with me: 95%+ of my messages don't require attachments. Any technology that can hit 95% of the use case is fine by me. * IT DOESN'T LIKE CHARACTER ENCODINGS. Works fine for me with Latin-1 and UTF-8. * FORMAT=FLOWED DOESN'T WORK RELIABLY. I don't use format=flowed in the first place. ... and so on and so on. When I look at the objections to inline PGP, the more I realize inline PGP hits the sweet spot for me and for a great many other users. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
