On 27/02/11 1:24 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 21:02:08 -0500, Avi <avi.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Why? Inline is simple and effective. I'm curious as to why you >> feel MIME is so much better. > > http://josefsson.org/inline-openpgp-considered-harmful.html
Thanks for the link. I'd only add that in-line is fine for encrypting messages since all the data in-line signing may whinge about (e.g. some UTF-8 characters) would be safely tucked away inside the encrypted block. Personally I only use in-line signing in a few places (or with a few correspondents) where I've got no choice. Regards, Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
