On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:50:34 -0500, Jerry <gnupg.u...@seibercom.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:07:26 +0100 >Bo Berglund <bo.bergl...@gmail.com> articulated: > >> Unfortunately the Gpg4Win 2.0.4 installer lets me choose if I want to >> install *all* of the extras by having a checkbox for each. But the >> GnuPG itself is *not* optional! And it installs the less stable 2.0.14 >> version... > >Maybe I missed it somewhere, but exactly why do you feel "2.0.14" is >unstable? I have been using gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.16 on my FreeBSD box >without a single problem. Prior to that, at one point in time, I did >have the older 1.x version installed. Updating to the newer 2.x versions >never caused a single problem. I realize that you are referring to a >different OS; however, I have not seen any definitive postings >regarding the "2.0.14" version's unsuitability to task in that OS. > >BTW, there are several GPG4Win mail forums, IRCs, etc available. > >http://www.gpg4win.org/community.html > >Perhaps they might better suit your needs. Thanks, I am just grasping for some way to get this stuff working *comfortably* with Win7 X64. Microsoft has decided that 32 bit applications cannot be allowed to integrate with the Windows Explorer context sensitive menu. This is where I do almost all my work by right clicking the file I want to process (edit, copy, open, encrypt, decrypt etc). But now since i got my latest laptop at work it came with Win7 X64 Professional and a *lot* of my applications that were earlier integrated (in XP Pro) are now invisible including GPGee, GPGshell (tested today) and my old workhorse UltraEdit. So I am trying to find *something* that can work for encryption use in Win7 X64. I don't particularly like the command prompt for that... -- Bo Berglund Developer in Sweden _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
