On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:07:26 +0100 Bo Berglund <bo.bergl...@gmail.com> articulated:
> Unfortunately the Gpg4Win 2.0.4 installer lets me choose if I want to > install *all* of the extras by having a checkbox for each. But the > GnuPG itself is *not* optional! And it installs the less stable 2.0.14 > version... Maybe I missed it somewhere, but exactly why do you feel "2.0.14" is unstable? I have been using gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.16 on my FreeBSD box without a single problem. Prior to that, at one point in time, I did have the older 1.x version installed. Updating to the newer 2.x versions never caused a single problem. I realize that you are referring to a different OS; however, I have not seen any definitive postings regarding the "2.0.14" version's unsuitability to task in that OS. BTW, there are several GPG4Win mail forums, IRCs, etc available. http://www.gpg4win.org/community.html Perhaps they might better suit your needs. -- Jerry ✌ gnupg.u...@seibercom.net _____________________________________________________________________ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. Q: What's the difference between a RHU cheerleader and a whale? A: The moustache.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
