Mark H. Wood wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:57:50PM +0200, Joke de Buhr wrote: >> You do not sacrifice legitimate incoming mail because there is an RFC that >> clearly states mailservers do not operate from dynamic IP addresses. >> Therefore >> they can not be considered valid. > > If there is such an RFC, it's rubbish; I run an MTA at home on my > dynamic address, and it works just fine, and is quite valid.
EXACTLY what Mark said, "RUBBISH"
MTA and keyserver here. My home ISP "blesses" me with a new address about once
every six months. Router automagically updates my DNS provider and everything is
good to go.
Cite the RFC, please.
--
John P. Clizbe Inet:John (a) Mozilla-Enigmail.org
You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or
mailto:pgp-public-k...@gingerbear.net?subject=help
Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?"
A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
