-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Thursday 10 June 2010 at 4:57:50 PM, in <mid:201006101757.53020.j...@seiken.de>, Joke de Buhr wrote: > One of the addresses of my key is totally unprotected > against spam. Nothing is blocked or scanned there. And > it doesn't get any spam at all. Fair enough. > As far as I know you cannot do a search like "2010" on > keyserver webinterfaces to get recently created keys. You get keys with "2010" in the user-id. About half of those returned by pgp.mit.edu have a 2010 creation date... > You do not sacrifice legitimate incoming mail because > there is an RFC that clearly states mailservers do not > operate from dynamic IP addresses. Therefore they can > not be considered valid. Plenty of people send mail using server software on their own computer, particularly those who move around and connect to the internet via a plethora of different ISPs and WiFi locations. That doesn't make it "correct". But being sent from an RFC-ignorant server does not make a message spam or illegitimate or invalid. It just makes it slightly more suspect. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Pain is inevitable, but misery is optional. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBTBET16ipC46tDG5pAQopSQQAizSSLXxshROsQRoY4tHFpzo/vTAlt55/ lAZVRyOMJuoxAXkAK30y6DZhTEwufclGKcvXLGXv/3ir/wjF1ovJhkRjeT37IUPz JjOjXIFHaay+yyWV/mNyPunDWkUk57C3EePsjeMlHo4NkKCm77MjxAdcHZL2ipnH dY45QC0iBsc= =ldxc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
