Hi Tom, Thank you very much for your very kind response to my remarks; apology accepted. We in Canada are especially sensitive on this, because of our unique and complicated relationship with the USA, more so than the rest of the non-USA English-speaking world.
Hartmut W Sager On Thu 05 Mar 2026 at 01:19:42 -06:00, Tom Route36 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hartmut, > > My apologies to you -- and Liz. No insult was intended with the "Aussies" > comment. And I guess I don't get out of the U.S. enough to realize that > we're the oddballs here with our "checks". And BTW, to all who took time to > comment on this topic, it was really interesting to hear all your > perspectives on how different folks deal with the date discrepancies. Thanks > to all who chimed in. > > And again, my apologies if that comment was inappropriate. > Tom > > > On 3/4/2026 9:08 PM, Hartmut W Sager wrote: >> It's not just "you Aussies", it's the entire rest of the English-speaking >> world, including my own Canada, that uses "cheques". 😊 The use of >> "cheques" also eliminates ambiguity in the expression "checks and balances". >> >> Hartmut W Sager >> >> >> On Mon 02 Mar 2026 at 21:07:49 -06:00, Tom Route36 <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi Liz, >>> >>> ..... didn't involve writing any check (or "cheque" for you >>> Aussies). >> _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list [email protected] To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
