On Thursday, February 20th, 2025 at 00:15, Kevin Buckley via gnucash-user <gnucash-user@gnucash.org> wrote: > > > > One way around this is to have the list server, or some intermediate MTA, > "munge" the From field into something like > > "Kalpesh Patel via GnuCash User List" gnucash-user@gnucash.org > > > along with adding your original email address into the headers (often into > the To header, because many list-servers will de-dupe outgoing addresses > to stop you getting a list copy as well) so that a Reply-to-all will still > go back to you, as well as the list. > > That appraoach can, of course, make the From field look "a bit messy" but > it does defeat this particular anti-phishing check. > > > > HTH (as well as hoping I have that, mostly, correct)
and, funnily enough, my Reply-To-All email, back to the list, which I have just received a copy of, HAS been sent out so that it appears to come from Kevin Buckley via gnucash-user <gnucash-user@gnucash.org> so maybe it's only some "new to the list server" emails that don't have the munging applied, as they are exploded back out? _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.