Indeed. You can select the accounts, but they don't display in the report. Ah well.
Perhaps someone with Scheme knowledge could modify the Balance Sheet to include all accounts. David T. On Feb 2, 2025, 7:47 PM, at 7:47 PM, Michael or Penny Novack via gnucash-user <gnucash-user@gnucash.org> wrote: >On 2/2/2025 2:33 AM, sunfish62--- via gnucash-user wrote: >> By which Derek means to imply that there isn't a report explicitly >for the Chart of Accounts. >> >> Perhaps a Balance Sheet would help? >> >> David T. > >A Balance Sheet will only show the "standing accounts" (fundamental >types Asset, Liability, Equity). It will not show the "temporary" >accounts of type Income and Expense (the NET of those shows up as a >virtual account "retained" (gains or losses). The way most of us use >gnucash we never do a "close the books" operation so that "temporary" >is >misleading. > >Keep mind, back in the old days, PHYSICAL books. Closing the old books >and opening new usually meant a new PHYSICAL book. But often, when >keeping the books for an entity with low volume of transaction, far >less >than a small bound volume would hold, just resumed after a couple >intentionally blank pages. LESS FORMAL (no legal need) I used "loose >leaf", but "for real" the bound books better as harder to alter without > >detection. > >Michael D Novack > >PS --- Have you considered the Trial Balance report if you need a >report >showing all accounts > > >_______________________________________________ >gnucash-user mailing list >gnucash-user@gnucash.org >To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: >https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user >----- >Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. >You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
