Check the Transaction Report's Account tab. On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, 2:36 pm Adrien Monteleone, < adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote:
> Yeah, that's why I started off with this would be trial and error level > effort. > > The OP wants transactions where at least one split appears in set A, but > excludes any such transactions when *other splits* also appear in set B. > > I *think* this is possible, but I have to admit, I've never tried. > > I'm guessing that running two separate Finds, one from the Accounts > page, and one from the Find results register is the way to go, but I > could be mistaken. > > I'm guessing that trying it all in one go will fall into the trap you > mention. > > But if the result register is somehow 'fixed' to the original splits > found, this entire endeavor may not be possible. > > Regards, > Adrien > > On 11/22/23 12:00 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > > Keep in mind that, GENERALLY, the search is on a SPLIT basis, not a > > TRANSACTION basis. So if you do a search on "Account == X AND Account == > > Y" you will get an empty set, because it is impossible to find anything > > where Split.account == X and Split.account ALSO equals Y. > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
