Yeah, that's why I started off with this would be trial and error level
effort.
The OP wants transactions where at least one split appears in set A, but
excludes any such transactions when *other splits* also appear in set B.
I *think* this is possible, but I have to admit, I've never tried.
I'm guessing that running two separate Finds, one from the Accounts
page, and one from the Find results register is the way to go, but I
could be mistaken.
I'm guessing that trying it all in one go will fall into the trap you
mention.
But if the result register is somehow 'fixed' to the original splits
found, this entire endeavor may not be possible.
Regards,
Adrien
On 11/22/23 12:00 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Keep in mind that, GENERALLY, the search is on a SPLIT basis, not a
TRANSACTION basis. So if you do a search on "Account == X AND Account ==
Y" you will get an empty set, because it is impossible to find anything
where Split.account == X and Split.account ALSO equals Y.
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
