If these are updates, then perhaps instead of 4.1, 4.2... 4.9, 4.10, 4.11,
it would be better to use "u" ('update') and have 4u1, 4u2,... 4u9, 4u10,
4u11.I tend to keep up with the updates, and use the latest version, but I can see it being confusing. On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 9:51 AM David G. Pickett via gnucash-user < gnucash-user@gnucash.org> wrote: > It is, generally a military style numbering, so the '.' is not a decimal > point, more a tab, not an alphanumeric sort but a numeric sort. One AT&T > project started their order numbers at 100,000,000 so they were always 9 > digits with 900M headroom. Maybe we could make the first revision after 4 > as 4.100, so the field is in both numeric and alpha sort order? > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > -- _________________________________ Richard Losey rlo...@gmail.com Micah 6:8 _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
