It is, generally a military style numbering, so the '.' is not a decimal point, more a tab, not an alphanumeric sort but a numeric sort. One AT&T project started their order numbers at 100,000,000 so they were always 9 digits with 900M headroom. Maybe we could make the first revision after 4 as 4.100, so the field is in both numeric and alpha sort order? _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
Re: [GNC] Confusing version numbers
David G. Pickett via gnucash-user Tue, 07 Mar 2023 07:52:04 -0800
- [GNC] Confusing version numbers aeg via gnucash-user
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version numbers Maf. King
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version num... aeg via gnucash-user
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version... William Prescott
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version num... Fred Bone
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version numbers Adrien Monteleone
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version numbers Karel Kadlubiec
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version numbers David G. Pickett via gnucash-user
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version num... R Losey
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version num... LI Daobing
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version... Adrien Monteleone
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version numbers aeg via gnucash-user
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version num... David G. Pickett via gnucash-user
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version numbers aeg via gnucash-user
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version num... Geert Janssens
- Re: [GNC] Confusing version... Peter West via gnucash-user