David, I like your idea, as its logical sequencing would obviously be clearer, but as Will pointed out, we are probably stuck with what's already established. Alan
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 15:50:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "David G. Pickett" <dgpick...@aol.com> To: "gnucash-user@gnucash.org" <gnucash-user@gnucash.org> Subject: Re: [GNC] Confusing version numbers Message-ID: <78074249.338554.1678204241...@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It is, generally a military style numbering, so the '.' is not a decimal point, more a tab, not an alphanumeric sort but a numeric sort.? One AT&T project started their order numbers at 100,000,000 so they were always 9 digits with 900M headroom.? Maybe we could make the first revision after 4 as 4.100, so the field is in both numeric and alpha sort order? _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
