I do my best to make each transaction model the real-world event. So if
the transaction looks like 2 checks instead of one (when there was only
1) then I'd edit the original credit to checking to reflect the full and
proper amount and delete the second credit to checking and the
transaction should still balance.
I'd do this just in case I would ever review this event in the future
and not have to worry about being confused or something not matching up
to external records.
But if you're happy with it and as long as everything works out for you,
then it is fine to have two credits summing to the total of the check.
(maybe add something to the Notes or Memos for your future self to
document this)
Regards,
Adrien
On 8/5/20 11:12 AM, Tim Quinn wrote:
Yes. And in my case, after editing the payment, rather than changing the
*single* credit to reflect the correct amount Gnucash created a *second* credit
for the difference (the amount of the correction). I had to manually set the
account for that second credit to the “Checking” account in GJ.
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
