On Saturday 30 May 2015 17:12:08 John Ralls wrote: > > On May 30, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Chris Good <chris.g...@ozemail.com.au> > > wrote: > > > > Hi John & Geert, > > > > Everybody has had a chance to express their opinion now. > > There doesn't seem to be a consensus on what the version number > > segments should be called in the community as a whole. > > There has been a lot of good information emerge that I would like to > > document in to the Development Process wiki section. > > > > If you can both agree on a naming scheme, I think we should go with > > whatever you both think. > > How about Geert's latest suggestion: fundamental.major.bugfix ? > > > > Or should I just document them as > > FirstSegment.SecondSegment.ThirdSegment? > Well, I still don’t care much for “fundamental”, but it’s better than > anything else we’ve come up with so let’s go with it. > > Regards, > John Ralls
Agreed. Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
