> On May 30, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Chris Good <chris.g...@ozemail.com.au> wrote: > > Hi John & Geert, > > Everybody has had a chance to express their opinion now. > There doesn't seem to be a consensus on what the version number segments > should be called in the community as a whole. > There has been a lot of good information emerge that I would like to > document in to the Development Process wiki section. > > If you can both agree on a naming scheme, I think we should go with whatever > you both think. > How about Geert's latest suggestion: fundamental.major.bugfix ? > > Or should I just document them as FirstSegment.SecondSegment.ThirdSegment?
Well, I still don’t care much for “fundamental”, but it’s better than anything else we’ve come up with so let’s go with it. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
