Hi All, I've asked for people to give their opinions on a GnuCash version numbering system as, from my few small documentation contributions, I think this should be defined somewhere.
I'll summarise what I've observed so far now that's it's been a week.
There has been some good input about what the 3 segments of the GnuCash
version number should be used for, although there is no general consensus
and some people are OK to leave the decision till later, or maybe decide if
the first 1 or 2 segments should change on a case by case basis.
We don't seem to be getting anywhere picking names for the 3 segments of the
version number, particularly the first segment.
We've had the following suggestions (in no particular order):
First Level:
Major
Architecture
Global
Fundamental
Framework
Basic
Base (I'm throwing this into the ring here)
Second Level:
Major
Minor
Third Level:
Minor
Micro
Bugfix
Point
Revision
Patch
Have I missed any?
I think it is generally agreed, (from the small number of opinions
expressed so far), that level 2 should be Major and level 3 should be Minor.
Can everyone that has an opinion please let us know, particularly regarding
the level 1 name?
Regards,
Chris Good
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
