On Jan 3, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Mike Alexander wrote: > --On January 3, 2011 10:13:34 AM -0800 Phil Longstaff <plongst...@rogers.com> > wrote: > >>> Compared to SVN: topic/feature/bugfix branches. For example look at >>> [2] and notice how each bug I’ve worked on has been in a separate >>> Git branch. That history has been squished flat by SVN, but Git >>> remembers the branchy development. >> >> Is remembering the 'branchy development' really a requirement here? >> SVN certainly supports feature and bugfix branches, and we've >> certainly used it that way. It does have a problem that you cannot >> really merge multiple times, so you have to worry about multiple >> merges from a branch back to trunk. >> >> [Phil] Is this still true with SVN 1.5 and 1.6. I know that >> somewhere in there, they improved merging and how merges were >> recorded, so these problems might have gone away. > > Is this what is described at > <http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn-book.html#svn.branchmerge.advanced.reintegratetwice>? > > Mike >
More or less. Looks like SVN is feeling a little heat. ;-) Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
