See comment below prefixed by [Phil] Phil --------- I used to be a hypochondriac AND a kleptomaniac. So I took something for it.
________________________________ From: Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu> To: Yawar Amin <yawar.a...@gmail.com> Cc: gnucash-devel gnucash <gnucash-devel@gnucash.org> Sent: Mon, January 3, 2011 11:53:51 AM Subject: Re: Public Git repo Yawar Amin <yawar.a...@gmail.com> writes: > Compared to SVN: topic/feature/bugfix branches. For example look at > [2] and notice how each bug I’ve worked on has been in a separate Git > branch. That history has been squished flat by SVN, but Git remembers > the branchy development. Is remembering the 'branchy development' really a requirement here? SVN certainly supports feature and bugfix branches, and we've certainly used it that way. It does have a problem that you cannot really merge multiple times, so you have to worry about multiple merges from a branch back to trunk. [Phil] Is this still true with SVN 1.5 and 1.6. I know that somewhere in there, they improved merging and how merges were recorded, so these problems might have gone away. _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
