Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At work, we make use of Access for some "departmental applications;"
> the conclusion that I'm coming to is that its "embedded data store"
> is not robust enough for anything more important than "not the
> faintest bit important."
This is something I've wondered, not being a big database person
myself. Is there some technical reason why no one has ever
implemented a free "database in a directory" system? Perhaps someone
has, but I haven't seen anything other than the standard db stuff.
What I mean is a library that understands sql, but can build and use a
self-contained database, no server necessary (ok, maybe a separate
process that's launched when you init the library) in a file or
perhaps a subdirectory. That seems like an extremely useful tool.
We could certainly use it.
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
