On 11/6/08, Petr Kovar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Christian Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:49:55 +0100: > > On 10/28/08, Petr Kovar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Kenneth Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:26:09 > > > +0100: > > > > 2008/10/28 Petr Kovar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > (...) > > > > > That's nice, but still, the problem is current from the moment the > > > > > first string migrates. And that was done some months ago. So many > > > > > translators got a problem now. But the most interesting part is > > > > > what the MsgctxtMigration page says: > > > > > > > > > > "Warning: > > > > > This is only a proposal at this time, and not approved for > > > > > project-wide application. This should not be applied before being > > > > > officially turned into a GNOME Goal." > > > > > > > > > > Oh really? Does anybody look at that? Does anybody give a damn > > > > > about that? Just wondering... ;-) > > > > > > > > Yes I remember you objected back then and still someone decided to > > > > test the transition, but now however, we _are_ discussing the > > > > possibility to make it an official GNOME goal! Any input in _that_ > > > > subject ;) > > > > > > Well, then I misunderstood the thread. So please, could this what I > > > might call, say, a discreditable situation be make an official GNOME > > > goal finally? Because the migration is already happening for some time, > > > and the warning notice seems like a confirmation that the current i18n > > > team work is, with all due respect, weak, irresolute, and generally > > > gives inconvincible results. Thus please, any senior member, do > > > something with that. Thanks. > > > > Well then. I'm all in favor for making it an official GNOME goal now, > > for all the reasons that have already been mentioned a dozen times. > > > > Danilo, what about you? What do you think about the msgctxt migration > > (http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/MsgctxtMigration)? > > > > And, what does the members of the Coordination Team think? > > I guess that no reply from the people asked above actually means, "we > don't care, or we don't have time to care". (We could also think > whether it is good for us if the coordinators don't care, or not, but > anyway...) > > Can we come to the point now and perform the needed action?
There you go, I have proposed it now: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2008-November/msg00218.html Christian _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
