2008/10/28 Petr Kovar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi! > > "Kenneth Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:34:54 +0100: > >> 2008/10/27 Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > This was discussed at several points in the past, most recently in >> > August. Is http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/MsgctxtMigration something >> > that we should target for Gnome 2.26 ? >> >> I definitely think so, the sooner we get rid of the "|" source of >> errors the better. Besides, if I remember correctly the only objection >> to fast integration of this, was that some popular translation tools >> didn't yet support it. > > Correct. It was (and unfortunately still is) Poedit, to be specific. > Thus, as I believe, a well known and widely used l10n tool among the GNOME > translators. > >> Deciding on it now will give the developers on >> those projects a good 4 months to implement it, make a new release and >> have this new version find its way into the repos of the different >> distributions, that is not an abundance of time, but it should be >> do-able. > > That's nice, but still, the problem is current from the moment the first > string migrates. And that was done some months ago. So many translators got > a problem now. But the most interesting part is what the MsgctxtMigration > page says: > > "Warning: > This is only a proposal at this time, and not approved for project-wide > application. This should not be applied before being officially turned into > a GNOME Goal." > > Oh really? Does anybody look at that? Does anybody give a damn about that? > Just wondering... ;-)
Yes I remember you objected back then and still someone decided to test the transition, but now however, we _are_ discussing the possibility to make it an official GNOME goal! Any input in _that_ subject ;) Regards Kenneth Nielsen _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
