On 10/28/08, Petr Kovar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Kenneth Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:26:09 +0100: > > 2008/10/28 Petr Kovar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > (...) > > > That's nice, but still, the problem is current from the moment the first > > > string migrates. And that was done some months ago. So many translators > > > got a problem now. But the most interesting part is what the > > > MsgctxtMigration page says: > > > > > > "Warning: > > > This is only a proposal at this time, and not approved for project-wide > > > application. This should not be applied before being officially turned > > > into a GNOME Goal." > > > > > > Oh really? Does anybody look at that? Does anybody give a damn about > > > that? Just wondering... ;-) > > > > Yes I remember you objected back then and still someone decided to > > test the transition, but now however, we _are_ discussing the > > possibility to make it an official GNOME goal! Any input in _that_ > > subject ;) > > > Well, then I misunderstood the thread. So please, could this what I > might call, say, a discreditable situation be make an official GNOME goal > finally? Because the migration is already happening for some time, and the > warning notice seems like a confirmation that the current i18n team work > is, with all due respect, weak, irresolute, and generally gives > inconvincible results. Thus please, any senior member, do something with > that. Thanks.
Well then. I'm all in favor for making it an official GNOME goal now, for all the reasons that have already been mentioned a dozen times. Danilo, what about you? What do you think about the msgctxt migration (http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/MsgctxtMigration)? And, what does the members of the Coordination Team think? Christian _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
