On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Petr Kovar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about not using the foot logo, or introducing a new logo, if desirable, > in Thai (and Lao, and perhaps some others) locale only? Would the logo > change be sufficient solely as a part of your l10n processes? I think it's better not to make it look like a fork. For example, without appropriate communication, one may think it's like the Firefox/Iceweasel rebranding case. It would be more seamless if people see the new logo somewhere at GNOME site as a sign of acceptance so that the logo can equally, or at least unofficially, represent GNOME, just like how the Debian project has two versions of logos. Then, we can add icon themes using the new logo, and let people choose or even make appropriate defaults based on locale. This will also allow people in other locales to choose the logo, although the foot is no issue for them. What do you think? Regards, -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/ _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
