Caribou was designed to be a replacement for GOK and support scanning
features as well. I think there may be some support buried in there that I
started work on. It's been a while...

Anyway, speech recognition sounds like a great idea too.

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:34 AM, William Best <standard7...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Well I suppose that I will try to join their next meeting.  Is anyone else
> interested in doing so?
>
> Will
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:22 PM Jeremy Whiting <jpwhit...@kde.org> wrote:
>
>> Seems to be here: https://wiki.gnome.org/Accessibility/
>>
>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:19 AM, William Best <standard7...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Brian,
>> >
>> > Where is the site for the GNOME Accessibility Team located?
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Will
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:15 PM William Best <standard7...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> All,
>> >>
>> >> I am familiar with GOK, and actually tracked down the original authors
>> of
>> >> that software.  I believe they were from the University of Toronto,
>> and were
>> >> no longer interested in doing that.  I am not sure about caribou.  I
>> think a
>> >> nice solution would be to integrate switch/pointer access in
>> conjunction
>> >> with speech recognition.
>> >>
>> >> This is a software application that some of the people I work with use:
>> >> http://goo.gl/43Mev6
>> >>
>> >> It is nearly $1000 USD though.
>> >>
>> >> I think there has to be someone out there with the skills to create
>> >> something like this as an open source project.  That is what I would
>> like to
>> >> help accomplish.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks!
>> >> Will
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:02 PM Cesar Mauri <ce...@crea-si.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Will,
>> >>>
>> >>> Not sure, not much into Gnome specific development, but in the past
>> >>> there were efforts devoted to a project called GOK [1]. It was a
>> >>> on-screen keyboard which supported scanning access. It seems that now
>> it
>> >>> has been replaced by Caribou [2]. Not sure about its current status.
>> The
>> >>> folks involved in this project might provide you more insight.
>> >>>
>> >>> [1]
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://developer.gnome.org/accessibility-devel-guide/stable/idp5239184.html
>> >>> [2]
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://wiki.gnome.org/action/show/Projects/Caribou?action=show&redirect=Caribou
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>>
>> >>> César
>> >>>
>> >>> El 29/05/2015 a las 17:37, William Best escribió:
>> >>> > Cesar,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I am going to try out your Viacam project with one of my individuals
>> >>> > at the beginning of next week.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I would like to get a project going that would bring switch access
>> to
>> >>> > Gnome via a programmable on-screen keyboard.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > How can something like this get started?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Thanks!
>> >>> > Will
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:21 AM Cesar Mauri <ce...@crea-si.com
>> >>> > <mailto:ce...@crea-si.com>> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >     Welcome William,
>> >>> >
>> >>> >     I've been working with people with cerebral palsy for more than
>> ten
>> >>> >     years and I maintain the Enable Viacam [1] open source project.
>> >>> >     Here in
>> >>> >     Spain I'm also involved in this project [2] (web page in
>> Spanish,
>> >>> >     sorry)
>> >>> >     in which we try to improve the social participation of people
>> with
>> >>> >     cerebral palsy through the use of technology.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >     In my view, there is still a lot to be done and, in general,
>> >>> >     accessibility is always lagging behind the pace of innovation,
>> >>> >     even more
>> >>> >     in the FOSS arena. Unfortunately, most "state of the art"
>> assistive
>> >>> >     technology is privative and, often, scandalously expensive, as
>> you
>> >>> >     already know.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >     As for speech recognition, we also had little success with
>> people
>> >>> > with
>> >>> >     cerebral palsy due to their speech disorders (dysarthria). In
>> most
>> >>> >     cases
>> >>> >     we have to rely on other input methods such as alternative
>> >>> > keyboards,
>> >>> >     mouses, joysticks or even switches and scanning techniques. Up
>> to
>> >>> > our
>> >>> >     knowledge, best solutions for specialised scanning access and
>> AAC
>> >>> > are
>> >>> >     only available for Windows and, in general, privative. One
>> >>> >     exception is
>> >>> >     SAW (Special Access to Windows) [3], very powerful but only for
>> >>> >     Windows
>> >>> >     and hard to use for most people. It would great if we had
>> >>> >     something like
>> >>> >     SAW but easy to use and available for FOSS environments. And
>> this
>> >>> > is
>> >>> >     just an example. Also open to collaborate.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >     [1] http://viacam.org
>> >>> >     [2] http://aspacenet.aspace.org/
>> >>> >     [3] https://sourceforge.net/projects/sawat/
>> >>> >
>> >>> >     Regards,
>> >>> >
>> >>> >     César
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >     El 29/05/2015 a las 15:17, William Best escribió:
>> >>> >     > Eric,
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     > I would love to help you with your project where I can. My
>> >>> > strengths
>> >>> >     > are not in writing code per se, but I understand the issues
>> you
>> >>> >     face.
>> >>> >     > I work with 120 individuals with all forms of disabilities.
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     > How successful have you been with using voice recognition
>> using
>> >>> >     > Windows?  I have had limited success with voice recognition
>> >>> >     technology
>> >>> >     > in my work.  This is mostly due to the people who have
>> physical
>> >>> >     > disabilities have cerebral palsy which also presents speech
>> >>> > problems
>> >>> >     > in these cases.
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     > Access is difficult for folks with disabilities, and my goal
>> is
>> >>> > to
>> >>> >     > collaborate with others to create open source versions of some
>> >>> > very
>> >>> >     > expensive propriety software systems.
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     > Could you send a video of you using your setup so I can
>> >>> >     visualize it?
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     > Thanks!
>> >>> >     > Will
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:06 AM Eric Johansson <e...@eggo.org
>> >>> >     <mailto:e...@eggo.org>
>> >>> >     > <mailto:e...@eggo.org <mailto:e...@eggo.org>>> wrote:
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     >     Welcome to the list. I joined because I am disabled and
>> >>> >     >     unfortunately the accessibility models currently available
>> >>> >     do not
>> >>> >     >     help me in the slightest. I was hoping to find the time to
>> >>> > serve
>> >>> >     >     my own needs which I know would serve the needs of other
>> >>> > people
>> >>> >     >     like myself with upper extremities disabilities and
>> dependent
>> >>> > on
>> >>> >     >     speech recognition.
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     >     Best laid plans etc cetera. :-)
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     >     Here's where I'm at and I could use some help.
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     >     the only really useful speech recognition environment
>> right
>> >>> >     now is
>> >>> >     >     nuances naturally speaking followed closely by Microsoft.
>> >>> >     >     obviously the main problem is they only run on Windows.
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     >     I have set up a prototype of a working environment where I
>> >>> > run
>> >>> >     >     Windows as a virtual machine dedicated solely to speech
>> >>> >     >     recognition. Then I have a bridge which transfers key
>> codes
>> >>> > or
>> >>> >     >     other types of speech events over to Linux from windows.
>> >>> > Right
>> >>> >     >     now, I've been somewhat successful with injecting speech
>> >>> >     generated
>> >>> >     >     characters into Linux applications. I'm working on the
>> next
>> >>> >     >     generation now and running into problems with uinput.  as
>> >>> >     soon as
>> >>> >     >     i fix those problems, using the community developed macro
>> >>> >     >     environment, we will have a reasonably useful speech
>> >>> > recognition
>> >>> >     >     system driving Linux.
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     >     What I mean by reasonably useful is that I can drive
>> emacs,
>> >>> >     write
>> >>> >     >     prose and a bit of code. With any luck, that would only
>> be a
>> >>> >     >     stone's throw away from being able to execute code on the
>> >>> > Linux
>> >>> >     >     side as a result of interpreting a grammar on the Windows
>> >>> > side.
>> >>> >     >     The remote execution capability would put us on a parity
>> with
>> >>> >     >     what's available on Windows.
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     >     Anyway, if you'd like to help, I would welcome assistance.
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     >     On May 29, 2015 8:29 AM, William Best
>> >>> >     <standard7...@gmail.com <mailto:standard7...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >     >     <mailto:standard7...@gmail.com
>> >>> >     <mailto:standard7...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>> >>> >     >     >
>> >>> >     >     > Hello,
>> >>> >     >     >
>> >>> >     >     > My name is William Best.  I am not sure if this is the
>> >>> > right
>> >>> >     >     group to join
>> >>> >     >     > for how I would like to contribute.
>> >>> >     >     >
>> >>> >     >     > My passion/career involves helping people with
>> >>> > developmental
>> >>> >     >     disabilities
>> >>> >     >     > get better access to technology.  Over the past year or
>> so,
>> >>> > I
>> >>> >     >     have been
>> >>> >     >     > experimenting with different Linux distributions to come
>> >>> >     up with a
>> >>> >     >     > low-cost, stable, and robust solution for the disabled
>> >>> >     people I
>> >>> >     >     work with.
>> >>> >     >     >
>> >>> >     >     > My goal is to help get features/apps that would help
>> >>> > disabled
>> >>> >     >     people access
>> >>> >     >     > technology in a better way.
>> >>> >     >     >
>> >>> >     >     > Let me know if I am in the right group for this.
>> >>> >     >     >
>> >>> >     >     > Thanks!
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     >
>> >>> >     > _______________________________________________
>> >>> >     > gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
>> >>> >     > gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org
>> >>> >     <mailto:gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org>
>> >>> >     >
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
>> >>> >
>> >>> >     _______________________________________________
>> >>> >     gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
>> >>> >     gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org
>> >>> >     <mailto:gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org>
>> >>> >
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
>> > gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org
>> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
>> >
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list

Reply via email to