2010/4/3 Joanmarie Diggs <joanmarie.di...@gmail.com> > Ya know.... The other thing that occurs to me is: Would it make more > sense to focus less on regular, real-time full team meetings and instead > prefer smaller group meetings based on the project/task? > > That might make a little more work for each project/task leader in terms > of reporting back to the full community (as Bryen described we should > get into the habit of doing). But it might make scheduling a bit easier > if we're not trying to accommodate *everyone* in terms of finding a > time. > > This is not a bad idea, but I think that we should do global meetings too (at least 1 per month) just to let the other folks know what's happening on each a11y area/project (actually we could use the m-l for this)...
opinions??? -- Flavio Percoco Premoli, A.K.A. [Flaper87] http://www.flaper87.org Usuario Linux registrado #436538 Geek by nature, Linux by choice, Archer of course. Key Fingerprint: CFC0 C67D FF73 463B 7E55 CF43 25D1 E75B E2DB 15C7 The Solution to everything: python -c "from struct import pack; print pack('5b', (41*len('99')), pow(8,2)+20, 4900**0.5, range(78)[-1], 10)"
_______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-list mailing list gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
