Hi,

GromPy is compatible with gmx 4.0.7. There are plans to port it to higher gmx versions, but I do not know when that will happen.

Cheers,
René

=====================================================
René Pool

Division of Molecular and Computational Toxicology
Department of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
De Boelelaan 1083
1081HV AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands
-----
IBIVU/Bioinformatics
Department of Computer Science
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
De Boelelaan 1081a
1081HV AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands

Room P 2.75
E: r.p...@vu.nl
T: +31 20 598 76 12
F: +31 20 598 76 10
=====================================================


On 01/25/2012 06:53 AM, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
Grompy looks like fancy.
Is it reliable for conducting GCMC??

I also need to perform GCMC along with MD.

In Grompy, it seems that the Grompy is compatible with gromacs 4.0.5.
The version of gromacs I use is 4.5.X.
Is it possible to use Grompy with my Gromacs??


2012/1/25 Gianluca Interlandi <gianl...@u.washington.edu <mailto:gianl...@u.washington.edu>>

    Hi Renè,

    This might be a silly question. In the documentation of GromPy it
    says that:

    "The system consists of mono-atomic water molceules defined in the
    MARTINI force field. The intermolecular interactions between such
    molecules are modelled using the Lennard-Jones potential only."

    My system is all-atom and all-hydrogen and I need to use the GBSA
    solvation model. Is it still going to work, or is the tutorial
    just an example of what you can do with GromPy?

    Thanks,

        Gianluca


    On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, René Pool wrote:

        By the way, the tutorial can be found on the wiki page at
        
https://github.com/GromPy/GromPy/wiki/Tutorial:-Using-GromPy-in-GCMC-mode.

        =====================================================
        René Pool

        Division of Molecular and Computational Toxicology
        Department of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
        Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
        De Boelelaan 1083
        1081HV AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands
        -----
        IBIVU/Bioinformatics
        Department of Computer Science
        Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
        De Boelelaan 1081a
        1081HV AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands

        Room P 2.75
        E: r.p...@vu.nl <mailto:r.p...@vu.nl>
        T: +31 20 598 76 12
        F: +31 20 598 76 10
        =====================================================

        On 01/24/2012 09:30 AM, Pool, R. wrote:
             Hi Gianluca,

             You might want to take a look at GromPy
             (https://github.com/GromPy/GromPy).
             This is a python interface to the GROMACS library.
        Amongst other
             applications, there is an option to perform
        grand-canonical Monte Carlo
             using GromPy. The necessary energy evaluations are
        performed using direct
             library calls to GROMACS. In this way it is possible to
        get around the
             possibly prohibitive file I/O in shell implementations
        that use the
             GROMACS executables. A paper on GromPy and GromPy/GCMC
        has recently been
             accepted in JCC, so more details will follow. In the
        meantime you can
             have a look at the code and the tutorial on the above
        website.

             Good luck!

             Cheers,
             Rene
             =====================================================
             René Pool

             Division of Molecular and Computational Toxicology
             Department of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
             Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
             De Boelelaan 1083
             1081HV AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands
             -----
             IBIVU/Bioinformatics
             Department of Computer Science
             Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
             De Boelelaan 1081a
             1081HV AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands

             Room P 2.75
             E: r.p...@vu.nl <mailto:r.p...@vu.nl>
             T: +31 20 598 76 12
             F: +31 20 598 76 10
             =====================================================

        
_____________________________________________________________________________________


        From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org
        <mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org>
        [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org
        <mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org>] on behalf
        of Rodrigo Faccioli [rodrigo_facci...@uol.com.br
        <mailto:rodrigo_facci...@uol.com.br>]
        Sent: 24 January 2012 05:29
        To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
        Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Monte Carlo with Gromacs and implicit
        solvent

        Hi Gianluca,

        I forgot to say that the step of compute the energies is
        considered from
        pdb2gmx until g_energy.

        Sorry about my oblivion.

        Best regards,

        --
        Rodrigo Antonio Faccioli
        Ph.D Student in Electrical Engineering
        University of Sao Paulo - USP
        Engineering School of Sao Carlos - EESC
        Department of Electrical Engineering - SEL
        Intelligent System in Structure Bioinformatics
        http://laips.sel.eesc.usp.br
        Phone: 55 (16) 3373-9366 Ext 229
        Curriculum Lattes - http://lattes.cnpq.br/1025157978990218
        Public Profile -
        http://br.linkedin.com/pub/rodrigo-faccioli/7/589/a5


        On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Rodrigo Faccioli
        <rodrigo_facci...@uol.com.br <mailto:rodrigo_facci...@uol.com.br>>
        wrote:
             Hi Gianluca,

             Thanks your question.

             All steps to obtain a generation with 200 individuals, on
        average,
             is 6 minutes for 1VII, example. In each generation I must
             converted my proteins Dihedral to Cartesian
        representation, compute
             the energies, choose the individuals which will go to
        reproduction,
             save previous population. This test was using one core of a
             conventional Desktop computer.

             The proteins, that I have tested my algorithm, vary from
        20 to 56
             amino acids.

             Best regards,

             --
             Rodrigo Antonio Faccioli
             Ph.D Student in Electrical Engineering
             University of Sao Paulo - USP
             Engineering School of Sao Carlos - EESC
             Department of Electrical Engineering - SEL
             Intelligent System in Structure Bioinformatics
        http://laips.sel.eesc.usp.br
             Phone: 55 (16) 3373-9366 Ext 229
             Curriculum Lattes - http://lattes.cnpq.br/1025157978990218
             Public Profile -
        http://br.linkedin.com/pub/rodrigo-faccioli/7/589/a5


        On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Gianluca Interlandi
        <gianl...@u.washington.edu <mailto:gianl...@u.washington.edu>>
        wrote:
             Thanks Enrico!

             Just wondering. How fast is it? Calling gromacs must have a
             lot of overhead. Also, do you call mdrun or does g_energy
             evaluate the energy?

             Gianluca

             On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Rodrigo Faccioli wrote:

                   Hi,

                   Although I don't work with MC simulation, I have
                   used Gromacs to obtain energies and others
                   protein features in my Evolutionary Algorithms
                   (EA).

                   In general lines, I created a script that calls
                   Gromacs programs and the output of these
                   programs, such as g_energy (I read its xvg file),
                   I stored it at a specific file which is
                   read by my algorithm and its values are put into
                   my data structure. I call Gromacs either
                   implicit or explicit solvent.

                   My project is working with EA until now. However,
                   the integration with GROMACS is able to
                   work with other kind of algorithms such as MC.
                   Actually, we have idea to work with MC. But,
                   I don't know when it will be possible. If you
                   want, we can talk about join these work.

                   Best regards,

                   --
                   Rodrigo Antonio Faccioli
                   Ph.D Student in Electrical Engineering
                   University of Sao Paulo - USP
                   Engineering School of Sao Carlos - EESC
                   Department of Electrical Engineering - SEL
                   Intelligent System in Structure Bioinformatics
        http://laips.sel.eesc.usp.br
                   Phone: 55 (16) 3373-9366 Ext 229
                   Curriculum Lattes -
        http://lattes.cnpq.br/1025157978990218
                   Public Profile -
        http://br.linkedin.com/pub/rodrigo-faccioli/7/589/a5


                   On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Gianluca
                   Interlandi <gianl...@u.washington.edu
        <mailto:gianl...@u.washington.edu>> wrote:
                        Hi!

                        I would like to use gromacs to perform Monte
                   Carlo simulations in implicit
                        solvent of a protein near a surface. The
                   protein is treated as a rigid body
                        whereas the surface is fix.

                        I see that there are plans to code MC into
                   gromacs:


        http://www.gromacs.org/Developer_Zone/Programming_Guide/Monte_Carlo

                        Is there a preliminary version?

                        If not, I wonder whether anybody has tried
                   to do MC with gromacs using IMD and
                        MDDriver:

        http://www.baaden.ibpc.fr/projects/mddriver/

                        Besides this. Is there an easy way to obtain
                   the force field energy of a system
                        using gromacs? Would I have to run a 0-steps
                   MD and read out the energy? I know
                        that this would have a big overhead in a MC
                   simulation, but it might be worth
                        trying.

                        Thanks,

                            Gianluca


                    -----------------------------------------------------
                        Gianluca Interlandi, PhD
        gianl...@u.washington.edu <mailto:gianl...@u.washington.edu>
                                           +1 (206) 685 4435

        http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/

                        Postdoc at the Department of Bioengineering
                        at the University of Washington, Seattle WA
                   U.S.A.

                    -----------------------------------------------------
                        --
                        gmx-users mailing list
        gmx-users@gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>

        http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
                        Please search the archive at

        http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search
                   before posting!
                        Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to
                   the list. Use the www interface or
                        send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
        <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
                        Can't post? Read
        http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists





             -----------------------------------------------------
             Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianl...@u.washington.edu
        <mailto:gianl...@u.washington.edu>
                                +1 (206) 685 4435
        http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/

             Postdoc at the Department of Bioengineering
             at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
             -----------------------------------------------------

        --
        gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
        <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
        http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
        Please search the archive at
        http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
        posting!
        Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
        www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
        <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
        Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists






    -----------------------------------------------------
    Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianl...@u.washington.edu
    <mailto:gianl...@u.washington.edu>
                       +1 (206) 685 4435
    http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/

    Postdoc at the Department of Bioengineering
    at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
    -----------------------------------------------------

    --
    gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
    http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
    Please search the archive at
    http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
    Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
    www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
    Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists


-- 
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to