By the way, the tutorial can be found on the wiki page at
https://github.com/GromPy/GromPy/wiki/Tutorial:-Using-GromPy-in-GCMC-mode.
=====================================================
René Pool
Division of Molecular and Computational Toxicology
Department of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
De Boelelaan 1083
1081HV AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands
-----
IBIVU/Bioinformatics
Department of Computer Science
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
De Boelelaan 1081a
1081HV AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands
Room P 2.75
E: r.p...@vu.nl
T: +31 20 598 76 12
F: +31 20 598 76 10
=====================================================
On 01/24/2012 09:30 AM, Pool, R. wrote:
Hi Gianluca,
You might want to take a look at GromPy
(https://github.com/GromPy/GromPy).
This is a python interface to the GROMACS library. Amongst other
applications, there is an option to perform grand-canonical Monte
Carlo using GromPy. The necessary energy evaluations are performed
using direct library calls to GROMACS. In this way it is possible to
get around the possibly prohibitive file I/O in shell implementations
that use the GROMACS executables. A paper on GromPy and GromPy/GCMC
has recently been accepted in JCC, so more details will follow. In the
meantime you can have a look at the code and the tutorial on the above
website.
Good luck!
Cheers,
Rene
=====================================================
René Pool
Division of Molecular and Computational Toxicology
Department of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
De Boelelaan 1083
1081HV AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands
-----
IBIVU/Bioinformatics
Department of Computer Science
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
De Boelelaan 1081a
1081HV AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands
Room P 2.75
E: r.p...@vu.nl
T: +31 20 598 76 12
F: +31 20 598 76 10
=====================================================
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org]
on behalf of Rodrigo Faccioli [rodrigo_facci...@uol.com.br]
*Sent:* 24 January 2012 05:29
*To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users
*Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] Monte Carlo with Gromacs and implicit solvent
Hi Gianluca,
I forgot to say that the step of compute the energies is considered
from pdb2gmx until g_energy.
Sorry about my oblivion.
Best regards,
--
Rodrigo Antonio Faccioli
Ph.D Student in Electrical Engineering
University of Sao Paulo - USP
Engineering School of Sao Carlos - EESC
Department of Electrical Engineering - SEL
Intelligent System in Structure Bioinformatics
http://laips.sel.eesc.usp.br
Phone: 55 (16) 3373-9366 Ext 229
Curriculum Lattes - http://lattes.cnpq.br/1025157978990218
Public Profile - http://br.linkedin.com/pub/rodrigo-faccioli/7/589/a5
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Rodrigo Faccioli
<rodrigo_facci...@uol.com.br <mailto:rodrigo_facci...@uol.com.br>> wrote:
Hi Gianluca,
Thanks your question.
All steps to obtain a generation with 200 individuals, on average,
is 6 minutes for 1VII, example. In each generation I must
converted my proteins Dihedral to Cartesian representation,
compute the energies, choose the individuals which will go to
reproduction, save previous population. This test was using one
core of a conventional Desktop computer.
The proteins, that I have tested my algorithm, vary from 20 to 56
amino acids.
Best regards,
--
Rodrigo Antonio Faccioli
Ph.D Student in Electrical Engineering
University of Sao Paulo - USP
Engineering School of Sao Carlos - EESC
Department of Electrical Engineering - SEL
Intelligent System in Structure Bioinformatics
http://laips.sel.eesc.usp.br
Phone: 55 (16) 3373-9366 Ext 229
Curriculum Lattes - http://lattes.cnpq.br/1025157978990218
Public Profile - http://br.linkedin.com/pub/rodrigo-faccioli/7/589/a5
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Gianluca Interlandi
<gianl...@u.washington.edu <mailto:gianl...@u.washington.edu>> wrote:
Thanks Enrico!
Just wondering. How fast is it? Calling gromacs must have a
lot of overhead. Also, do you call mdrun or does g_energy
evaluate the energy?
Gianluca
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Rodrigo Faccioli wrote:
Hi,
Although I don't work with MC simulation, I have used
Gromacs to obtain energies and others
protein features in my Evolutionary Algorithms (EA).
In general lines, I created a script that calls Gromacs
programs and the output of these
programs, such as g_energy (I read its xvg file), I stored
it at a specific file which is
read by my algorithm and its values are put into my data
structure. I call Gromacs either
implicit or explicit solvent.
My project is working with EA until now. However, the
integration with GROMACS is able to
work with other kind of algorithms such as MC. Actually,
we have idea to work with MC. But,
I don't know when it will be possible. If you want, we can
talk about join these work.
Best regards,
--
Rodrigo Antonio Faccioli
Ph.D Student in Electrical Engineering
University of Sao Paulo - USP
Engineering School of Sao Carlos - EESC
Department of Electrical Engineering - SEL
Intelligent System in Structure Bioinformatics
http://laips.sel.eesc.usp.br
Phone: 55 (16) 3373-9366 Ext 229
Curriculum Lattes - http://lattes.cnpq.br/1025157978990218
Public Profile -
http://br.linkedin.com/pub/rodrigo-faccioli/7/589/a5
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Gianluca Interlandi
<gianl...@u.washington.edu
<mailto:gianl...@u.washington.edu>> wrote:
Hi!
I would like to use gromacs to perform Monte Carlo
simulations in implicit
solvent of a protein near a surface. The protein is
treated as a rigid body
whereas the surface is fix.
I see that there are plans to code MC into gromacs:
http://www.gromacs.org/Developer_Zone/Programming_Guide/Monte_Carlo
Is there a preliminary version?
If not, I wonder whether anybody has tried to do MC
with gromacs using IMD and
MDDriver:
http://www.baaden.ibpc.fr/projects/mddriver/
Besides this. Is there an easy way to obtain the
force field energy of a system
using gromacs? Would I have to run a 0-steps MD and
read out the energy? I know
that this would have a big overhead in a MC
simulation, but it might be worth
trying.
Thanks,
Gianluca
-----------------------------------------------------
Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianl...@u.washington.edu
<mailto:gianl...@u.washington.edu>
+1 (206) 685 4435 <tel:%2B1%20%28206%29%20685%204435>
http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/
Postdoc at the Department of Bioengineering
at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
-----------------------------------------------------
--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
<mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list.
Use the www interface or
send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
<mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
Can't post? Read
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
-----------------------------------------------------
Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianl...@u.washington.edu
<mailto:gianl...@u.washington.edu>
+1 (206) 685 4435 <tel:%2B1%20%28206%29%20685%204435>
http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/
Postdoc at the Department of Bioengineering
at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
-----------------------------------------------------
--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
<mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
<mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
