github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] refactor: introduce ProbeEnd state in NestedLoopJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: introduce ProbeEnd state in NestedLoopJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: introduce ProbeEnd state in NestedLoopJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] chore: do not run code CI for documentation only PRs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] chore: do not run code CI for documentation only PRs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] chore: do not run code CI for documentation only PRs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] DataFusionError should be MECE [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] DataFusionError should be MECE [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Accurately reserve memory in the build side of hash joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Accurately reserve memory in the build side of hash joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Accurately reserve memory in the build side of hash joins [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: decouple partition's location from executor's metadata [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: decouple partition location from executor metadata [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: decouple partition location from executor metadata [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Revert custom allocator auditing of MemoryPool tracking in SLTs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert custom allocator auditing of MemoryPool tracking in SLTs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert custom allocator auditing of MemoryPool tracking in SLTs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert custom allocator auditing of MemoryPool tracking in SLTs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert custom allocator auditing of MemoryPool tracking in SLTs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert custom allocator auditing of MemoryPool tracking in SLTs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Native Parquet Iceberg Data File Writes In Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Rich t kid/multi dictionary benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rich t kid/multi dictionary benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rich t kid/multi dictionary benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rich t kid/multi dictionary benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Parser: fix exponential parse time on table-factor paren chains [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps-dev): bump shell-quote from 1.8.3 to 1.8.4 in /datafusion/wasmtest/datafusion-wasm-app [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps-dev): bump shell-quote from 1.8.3 to 1.8.4 in /datafusion/wasmtest/datafusion-wasm-app [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Revisit the case for native columnar-to-row? [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Revisit the case for native columnar-to-row? [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Revisit the case for native columnar-to-row? [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] [main] Update version and changelog to 54.0.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [main] Update version and changelog to 54.0.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [main] Update version and changelog to 54.0.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [I] Optimize existence-probe for `RightSemi`, `RightAnti` joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize existence-probe for `RightSemi`, `RightAnti` joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize existence-probe for `RightSemi`, `RightAnti` joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize existence-probe for `RightSemi`, `RightAnti` joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize `RightSemi`, `RightAnti` joins with existence-probes [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Performance regression when a stage of WholeStageCodegen-fusible operators runs as separate native Comet operators [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] chore: Migrate to openDAL 57 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] chore: Migrate to openDAL 57 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] `ExecutorMetatada` too verbose [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `ExecutorMetatada` too verbose [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `ExecutorMetatada` too verbose [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `ExecutorMetatada` too verbose [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `ExecutorMetatada` too verbose [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `ExecutorMetatada` too verbose [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `ExecutorMetatada` too verbose [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `ExecutorMetatada` too verbose [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(lambda): keep multi-param lambda parameter positions stable [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(lambda): keep multi-param lambda parameter positions stable [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(lambda): keep multi-param lambda parameter positions stable [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(lambda): keep multi-param lambda parameter positions stable [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(lambda): keep multi-param lambda parameter positions stable [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(lambda): keep multi-param lambda parameter positions stable [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(tui): Add theming support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Add theming support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Add theming support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Add theming support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Add theming support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Add theming support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Add theming support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Add theming support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Add theming support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Add theming support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Add theming support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Add theming support [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [I] [TUI]: Add support for UI themes [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [TUI]: Add support for UI themes [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(topk): call attempt_early_completion when filter rejects entire b… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(topk): call attempt_early_completion when filter rejects entire b… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(topk): call attempt_early_completion when filter rejects entire b… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(topk): call attempt_early_completion when filter rejects entire b… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(topk): call attempt_early_completion when filter rejects entire b… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(topk): call attempt_early_completion when filter rejects entire batch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(topk): call attempt_early_completion when filter rejects entire batch [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: make `date_part` always return Float64 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Unaccounted time in `sort.rs` - `ExternalSorter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Unaccounted time in `sort.rs` - `ExternalSorter` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): align object_store_opendal with opendal [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): align object_store_opendal with opendal [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): align object_store_opendal with opendal [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] TopK early-exit doesn't fire when heap's dynamic filter rejects an entire batch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopK early-exit doesn't fire when heap's dynamic filter rejects an entire batch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopK early-exit doesn't fire when heap's dynamic filter rejects an entire batch [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Iceberg native readers not supported on AWS Glue Catalog? [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Iceberg native readers not supported on AWS Glue Catalog? [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Iceberg native readers not supported on AWS Glue Catalog? [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Iceberg native readers not supported on AWS Glue Catalog? [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Iceberg native readers not supported on AWS Glue Catalog? [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Add a configurable cap on spill-file merge fan-in (max open files during external merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: REST API stage plan is too busy [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: REST API stage plan is too busy [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: REST API stage plan is too busy [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: REST API stage plan is too busy [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: REST API stage plan is too busy [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: REST API stage plan is too busy [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages