github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] feat: Add from_unixtime support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add from_unixtime support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add from_unixtime support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add from_unixtime support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add from_unixtime support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add from_unixtime support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add from_unixtime support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add from_unixtime support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add from_unixtime support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add from_unixtime support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release Comet 0.9.0 (June/July 2025) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release Comet 0.9.0 (June/July 2025) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release Comet 0.9.0 (June/July 2025) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release Comet 0.9.0 (June/July 2025) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release Comet 0.9.0 (June/July 2025) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] SQL Unparser Can Not Process Struct Of Struct Access When Generating Sql [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SQL Unparser Can Not Process Struct Of Struct Access When Generating Sql [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SQL Unparser Can Not Process Struct Of Struct Access When Generating Sql [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Logical plan creation for Substrait plans with aggregate relations [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: disallow specify both order_by and within_group [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: disallow specify both order_by and within_group [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: disallow specify both order_by and within_group [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: disallow specify both order_by and within_group [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: disallow specify both order_by and within_group [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: disallow specify both order_by and within_group [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: disallow specify both order_by and within_group [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: disallow specify both order_by and within_group [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implementation for regex_instr [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] limit intermediate batch size in nested_loop_join [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Add comments to ClickBench queries about setting binary_as_string [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add comments to ClickBench queries about setting binary_as_string [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add comments to ClickBench queries about setting binary_as_string [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add comments to ClickBench queries about setting binary_as_string [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add comments to ClickBench queries about setting binary_as_string [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add comments to ClickBench queries about setting binary_as_string [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Support explain tree format debug for benchmark debug [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support explain tree format debug for benchmark debug [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support explain tree format debug for benchmark debug [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support explain tree format debug for benchmark debug [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support explain tree format debug for benchmark debug [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support explain tree format debug for benchmark debug [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support explain tree format debug for benchmark debug [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [datafusion-spark] Implement spark `luhn_check` function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [datafusion-spark] Implement spark `luhn_check` function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [datafusion-spark] Implement spark `luhn_check` function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [datafusion-spark] Implement Spark `luhn_check` function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [datafusion-spark] Implement Spark `luhn_check` function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [datafusion-spark] Implement Spark `luhn_check` function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [datafusion-spark] Implement Spark `luhn_check` function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [datafusion-spark] Implement Spark `luhn_check` function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [datafusion-spark] Implement Spark `luhn_check` function [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support integration with Parquet modular encryption [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Support explain tree format debug for benchmark debug [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support explain tree format debug for benchmark debug [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support explain tree format debug for benchmark debug [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Wrong results when `pushdown_filters` is enabled (starting in 48.0.0) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wrong results when `pushdown_filters` is enabled (starting in 48.0.0) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wrong results when `pushdown_filters` is enabled (starting in 48.0.0) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wrong results when `pushdown_filters` is enabled (starting in 48.0.0) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wrong results when `pushdown_filters` is enabled (starting in 48.0.0) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wrong results when `pushdown_filters` is enabled (starting in 48.0.0) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wrong results when `pushdown_filters` is enabled (starting in 48.0.0) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wrong results when `pushdown_filters` is enabled (starting in 48.0.0) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wrong results when `pushdown_filters` is enabled (starting in 48.0.0) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wrong results when `pushdown_filters` is enabled (starting in 48.0.0) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wrong results when `pushdown_filters` is enabled (starting in 48.0.0) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Wrong results when `pushdown_filters` is enabled (starting in 48.0.0) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Add a document page for all available metrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add a document page for all available metrics [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [D] DataSourceExec metrics explanation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DataSourceExec metrics explanation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DataSourceExec metrics explanation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DataSourceExec metrics explanation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Ignore a test case fails on Miri [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Ignore a test case fails on Miri [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Ignore a test case fails on Miri [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Ignore a test case fails on Miri [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] is it possible to make a async UDTF that read rows from other database? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] is it possible to make a async UDTF that read rows from other database? [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: make datafusion-cli running inconsistent with clickbench benchma… [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] suggest compile binaries with dynamic libs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] suggest compile binaries with dynamic libs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] suggest compile binaries with dynamic libs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Allow usage of table functions in relations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow usage of table functions in relations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow usage of table functions in relations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow usage of table functions in relations [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support `from_unixtime(ts, [fmt])` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support `from_unixtime(ts, [fmt])` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support `from_unixtime(ts, [fmt])` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support `from_unixtime(ts, [fmt])` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support `from_unixtime(ts, [fmt])` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support `from_unixtime(ts, [fmt])` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support `from_unixtime(ts, [fmt])` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support `from_unixtime(ts, [fmt])` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support `from_unixtime(ts, [fmt])` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support `from_unixtime(ts, [fmt])` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Improve performance of ClickBench Q21 by removing the cast [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve performance of ClickBench Q21 by removing the cast [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve performance of ClickBench Q21 by removing the cast [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [D] how to run tpch benchmark datafusion [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [D] Optimizing dafafusion Build in CI [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [D] DISCUSSION: DataFusion Meetup in New York, NY, USA [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: DataFusion Meetup in New York, NY, USA [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: DataFusion Meetup in New York, NY, USA [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: DataFusion Meetup in New York, NY, USA [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [PoC] Add API for tracking distinct buffers in `MemoryPool` by reference count [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PoC] Add API for tracking distinct buffers in `MemoryPool` by reference count [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [PoC] Add API for tracking distinct buffers in `MemoryPool` by reference count [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add microbenchmark for spilling with compression [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add microbenchmark for spilling with compression [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add microbenchmark for spilling with compression [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add microbenchmark for spilling with compression [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add microbenchmark for spilling with compression [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add microbenchmark for spilling with compression [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add microbenchmark for spilling with compression [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Change back SmallVec to Vec for JoinHashMap [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] dynamic filter refactor [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Fix `EquivalenceClass` calculation for Union queries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fix `EquivalenceClass` calculation for Union queries [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Refactor statement execution logic in `datafusion-cli` [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages