github  

Messages by Thread

• [PR] feat: support dictionary in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support dictionary in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support dictionary in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support dictionary in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support dictionary in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support dictionary in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] support Dictionary types in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] support Dictionary types in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] support Dictionary types in approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: preserve current AQE logical-stage links on Comet operators [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve current AQE logical-stage links on Comet operators [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve current AQE logical-stage links on Comet operators [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve current AQE logical-stage links on Comet operators [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: add data source codec extension seam [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: ignore structural tags when lifting expression coverage [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ignore structural tags when lifting expression coverage [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ignore structural tags when lifting expression coverage [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ignore structural tags when lifting expression coverage [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Reduce the DataFusion WASM size [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Reduce the DataFusion WASM size [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Building project takes a *long* time (esp compilation time for `datafusion` core crate) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] main branch test fix: adjust dynamic filter assertion for hash collisions handling [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] main branch test fix: adjust dynamic filter assertion for hash collisions handling [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] main branch test fix: adjust dynamic filter assertion for hash collisions handling [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] main branch test fix: adjust dynamic filter assertion for hash collisions handling [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] main branch test fix: adjust dynamic filter assertion for hash collisions handling [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Make `udaf_default_*` display/schema name helpers non-generic to reduce code size [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make `udaf_default_*` display/schema name helpers non-generic to reduce code size [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make `udaf_default_*` display/schema name helpers non-generic (214 KB smaller binary) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make `udaf_default_*` display/schema name helpers non-generic (214 KB smaller binary) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make `udaf_default_*` display/schema name helpers non-generic (214 KB smaller binary) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make `udaf_default_*` display/schema name helpers non-generic (214 KB smaller binary) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Sort-aware Iceberg reads in Comet via a per-partition streaming merge [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Sort-aware Iceberg reads in Comet via a per-partition streaming merge [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Sort-aware Iceberg reads in Comet via a per-partition streaming merge [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Sort-aware Iceberg reads in Comet via a per-partition streaming merge [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Sort-aware Iceberg reads in Comet via a per-partition streaming merge [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] [EPIC] Reduce binary size [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Reduce binary size [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Reduce binary size [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Reduce binary size [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: preserve cast target metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve cast target metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve cast target metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve cast target metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve cast target metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve cast target metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve cast target metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Cast expressions cannot distinguish inherited metadata from an explicitly empty target [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cast expressions cannot distinguish inherited metadata from an explicitly empty target [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] NestedLoopJoin memory-limited fallback re-executes the build side, losing rows for non-replayable inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: spill the NestedLoopJoin build side from the pass that consumed it [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: drain completed sort-merge join output before awaiting input [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix CASE evaluation for custom column expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix CASE evaluation for custom column expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix CASE evaluation for custom column expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix CASE evaluation for custom column expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix CASE evaluation for custom column expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix CASE evaluation for custom column expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix CASE evaluation for custom column expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix CASE evaluation for custom column expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix CASE evaluation for custom column expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix CASE evaluation for custom column expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: FFI constructors adopt arguments when the input is already foreign [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: FFI constructors adopt arguments when the input is already foreign [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: FFI constructors adopt arguments when the input is already foreign [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve provided arguments during FFI object construction [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve provided arguments during FFI object construction [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve provided arguments during FFI object construction [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] FFI constructors silently discard arguments when the input is already foreign [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FFI constructors silently discard arguments when the input is already foreign [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Projection field metadata is lost during physical plan optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Projection field metadata is lost during physical plan optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support floating-point ASOF equality keys [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support floating-point ASOF equality keys [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support floating-point ASOF equality keys [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support floating-point ASOF equality keys [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] WIP: NOT READY FOR REVIEW: Add parquet `progressive_io` option to keep one-shot row group I/O with pushdown filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: NOT READY FOR REVIEW: Add parquet `progressive_io` option to keep one-shot row group I/O with pushdown filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: NOT READY FOR REVIEW: Add parquet `progressive_io` option to keep one-shot row group I/O with pushdown filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: NOT READY FOR REVIEW: Add parquet `progressive_io` option to keep one-shot row group I/O with pushdown filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: NOT READY FOR REVIEW: Add parquet `progressive_io` option to keep one-shot row group I/O with pushdown filters [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix unparse union all nested distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] WIP: DO NOT REVIEW: Benchmark enabling parquet filter pushdown by default with one-shot row group I/O [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: DO NOT REVIEW: Benchmark enabling parquet filter pushdown by default with one-shot row group I/O [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: DO NOT REVIEW: Benchmark enabling parquet filter pushdown by default with one-shot row group I/O [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: DO NOT REVIEW: Benchmark enabling parquet filter pushdown by default with one-shot row group I/O [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: DO NOT REVIEW: Benchmark enabling parquet filter pushdown by default with one-shot row group I/O [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: DO NOT REVIEW: Benchmark enabling parquet filter pushdown by default with one-shot row group I/O [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: DO NOT REVIEW: Benchmark enabling parquet filter pushdown by default with one-shot row group I/O [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: DO NOT REVIEW: Benchmark enabling parquet filter pushdown by default with one-shot row group I/O [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: DO NOT REVIEW: Benchmark enabling parquet filter pushdown by default with one-shot row group I/O [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: DO NOT REVIEW: Benchmark enabling parquet filter pushdown by default with one-shot row group I/O [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: support RunEndEncoded arrays in function and window frame type coercion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: support RunEndEncoded arrays in function and window frame type coercion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: support RunEndEncoded arrays in function and window frame type coercion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: support RunEndEncoded arrays in function and window frame type coercion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: support RunEndEncoded arrays in function and window frame type coercion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: support RunEndEncoded arrays in function and window frame type coercion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: support RunEndEncoded arrays in function and window frame type coercion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: support RunEndEncoded arrays in function and window frame type coercion [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: do not duplicate volatile expressions when extracting leaf expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: do not duplicate volatile expressions when extracting leaf expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: do not duplicate volatile expressions when extracting leaf expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: do not duplicate volatile expressions when extracting leaf expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: do not duplicate volatile expressions when extracting leaf expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: do not duplicate volatile expressions when extracting leaf expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: do not duplicate volatile expressions when extracting leaf expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: do not duplicate volatile expressions when extracting leaf expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Refresh SQL parser settings between statistics query files [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Refresh SQL parser settings between statistics query files [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Refresh SQL parser settings between statistics query files [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Address avg return type overflow for decimals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Address avg return type overflow for decimals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Address avg return type overflow for decimals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Address avg return type overflow for decimals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Address avg return type overflow for decimals [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix panic on RightMark hash joins when propagating ordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix panic on RightMark hash joins when propagating ordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix panic on RightMark hash joins when propagating ordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix panic on RightMark hash joins when propagating ordering [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(catalog): apply a MemTable DELETE or UPDATE when the plan runs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(catalog): apply a MemTable DELETE or UPDATE when the plan runs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(catalog): apply a MemTable DELETE or UPDATE when the plan runs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(catalog): apply a MemTable DELETE or UPDATE when the plan runs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(catalog): apply a MemTable DELETE or UPDATE when the plan runs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support config matrix for SLT tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support config matrix for SLT tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support config matrix for SLT tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support config matrix for SLT tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support config matrix for SLT tests [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix Hive SKEWED BY display [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Incorrect filtering results when `collect_statistics = true` and column statistics are partially disabled [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect filtering results when `collect_statistics = true` and column statistics are partially disabled [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: use macro to declare ballista config options [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: use macro to expose ballista config options [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: use macro to expose ballista config options [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: cleanup ballista config code [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: cleanup ballista config code [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: cleanup ballista config code [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: cleanup ballista config code [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: cleanup ballista config code [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: cleanup ballista config code [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: cleanup ballista config code [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: cleanup & simplify ballista config [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages