xudong963 opened a new issue, #16511: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16511
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? The predicates in filter can be variable, it's possible to use the cp_solver to simplify the predicates in filter, then reduce the computing cost for filter. ### Describe the solution you'd like We've done some basic simplification in https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16362, we can make it a start to develop a more sophisticated rule to cover more cases ### Describe alternatives you've considered _No response_ ### Additional context What I want to discuss: 1. Make it a new physical optimizer rule? Or add them to the current physical filter push down 2. Some filters, such as partition columns related predicates, will be fully pushed down scan, that is, we don't have such predicates in some FilterExec. How to capture this? 3. TBD (You may have other thoughts!) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
