berkaysynnada commented on PR #15563:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15563#issuecomment-2788703235

   > > @geoffreyclaude I'm going to merge if you're done with this?
   > 
   > @berkaysynnada: Fine by me! We resolved the (unfortunately, necessary) 
semi-redundant common prefix field.
   > 
   > Only remaining question is the Emission type: if it makes sense to leave 
it as `Both` you can merge, but if you think `Incremental` makes more sense I 
can do a quick new commit to change it.
   
   Let's make it incremental for consistency. We're thinking on this, and 
likely figure out a refactor to make all things more clear. (if you wonder, 
there is also an issue here 
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15479#issuecomment-2786362233. These 
two cases seem to be related and I believe I'll solve them all)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to