nseekhao commented on code in PR #14194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14194#discussion_r1973968357
##########
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/producer.rs:
##########
@@ -559,12 +559,31 @@ pub fn from_table_scan(
let table_schema = scan.source.schema().to_dfschema_ref()?;
let base_schema = to_substrait_named_struct(&table_schema)?;
+ let best_effort_filter_option = if !scan.filters.is_empty() {
+ let table_schema_qualified = Arc::new(
+ DFSchema::try_from_qualified_schema(
+ scan.table_name.clone(),
+ &(scan.source.schema()),
+ )
+ .unwrap(),
+ );
+ let mut combined_expr = scan.filters[0].clone();
+ for i in 1..scan.filters.len() {
+ combined_expr = combined_expr.and(scan.filters[i].clone());
+ }
+ let best_effort_filter_expr =
+ producer.handle_expr(&combined_expr, &table_schema_qualified)?;
+ Some(Box::new(best_effort_filter_expr))
+ } else {
+ None
+ };
+
Ok(Box::new(Rel {
rel_type: Some(RelType::Read(Box::new(ReadRel {
common: None,
base_schema: Some(base_schema),
filter: None,
- best_effort_filter: None,
+ best_effort_filter: best_effort_filter_option,
Review Comment:
> I think TableScan, as a logical node, is stating that all filters MUST be
applied. The equivalent logical plan in Substrait is a ReadRel with filter.
@westonpace , if all filters MUST be applied, then what scenarios are the
`Inexact` filters used for?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
