wiedld commented on code in PR #14329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14329#discussion_r1931110873


##########
datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/invariants.rs:
##########
@@ -41,19 +61,54 @@ pub enum InvariantLevel {
     Executable,
 }
 
+/// Apply the [`InvariantLevel::Always`] check at the root plan node only.
 pub fn assert_always_invariants(plan: &LogicalPlan) -> Result<()> {
     // Refer to 
<https://datafusion.apache.org/contributor-guide/specification/invariants.html#relation-name-tuples-in-logical-fields-and-logical-columns-are-unique>
     assert_unique_field_names(plan)?;
 
     Ok(())
 }
 
+/// Visit the plan nodes, and confirm the [`InvariantLevel::Executable`]
+/// as well as the less stringent [`InvariantLevel::Always`] checks.
 pub fn assert_executable_invariants(plan: &LogicalPlan) -> Result<()> {
+    // Always invariants
     assert_always_invariants(plan)?;
+    assert_valid_extension_nodes(plan, InvariantLevel::Always)?;
+
+    // Executable invariants
+    assert_valid_extension_nodes(plan, InvariantLevel::Executable)?;

Review Comment:
   Presuming that the extension nodes are not at the plan root, these are 
checked only during the recursive assertion (a.k.a. 
`assert_executable_invariants`). Here you see that the always and executable 
invariants, for the extension nodes, are both checked.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to