Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 07:44:27PM +0200, Martin Ågren wrote: > >> On 31 July 2017 at 05:46, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: >> > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 08:17:42PM +0200, Martin Ågren wrote: >> > >> >> On 21 July 2017 at 00:27, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> > I tend to agree with you that 1-3/10 may be better off being a >> >> > single patch (or 3/10 dropped, as Brandon is working on losing it >> >> > nearby). I would have expected 7-8/10 to be a single patch, as by >> >> > the time a reader reaches 07/10, because of the groundwork laid by >> >> > 04-06/10, it is obvious that the general direction is to allow the >> >> > caller, i.e. cmd_tag(), to make a call to setup_auto_pager() only in >> >> > some but not all circumstances, and 07/10 being faithful to the >> >> > original behaviour (only to be updated in 08/10) is somewhat counter >> >> > intuitive. It is not wrong per-se; it was just unexpected. >> >> >> >> Thanks for your comments. I will be away for a few days, but once I >> >> get back, I'll try to produce a v3 based on this and any further >> >> feedback. >> > >> > Overall it looks good to me. I left a few minor comments. >> > >> > I actually like the split. I found it pretty easy to follow (though >> > squashing as Junio suggested would be fine with me, too). >> >> I assume that by "the split" you mean patches 7-8, not 1-3. Anyway, >> I'll squash since you're fine with it and Junio prefers it. > > I actually meant both, but as I said, I'm OK with it either way.
I am OK with it either way, too ;-)
