On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 07:44:27PM +0200, Martin Ågren wrote: > On 31 July 2017 at 05:46, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 08:17:42PM +0200, Martin Ågren wrote: > > > >> On 21 July 2017 at 00:27, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> > I tend to agree with you that 1-3/10 may be better off being a > >> > single patch (or 3/10 dropped, as Brandon is working on losing it > >> > nearby). I would have expected 7-8/10 to be a single patch, as by > >> > the time a reader reaches 07/10, because of the groundwork laid by > >> > 04-06/10, it is obvious that the general direction is to allow the > >> > caller, i.e. cmd_tag(), to make a call to setup_auto_pager() only in > >> > some but not all circumstances, and 07/10 being faithful to the > >> > original behaviour (only to be updated in 08/10) is somewhat counter > >> > intuitive. It is not wrong per-se; it was just unexpected. > >> > >> Thanks for your comments. I will be away for a few days, but once I > >> get back, I'll try to produce a v3 based on this and any further > >> feedback. > > > > Overall it looks good to me. I left a few minor comments. > > > > I actually like the split. I found it pretty easy to follow (though > > squashing as Junio suggested would be fine with me, too). > > I assume that by "the split" you mean patches 7-8, not 1-3. Anyway, > I'll squash since you're fine with it and Junio prefers it.
I actually meant both, but as I said, I'm OK with it either way. -Peff
