Sengan Baring-Gould wrote:
>
> Jon M. Taylor wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:47:15AM +0200, Steffen Seeger wrote:
> > > > Andrew Apted wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Steffen Seeger writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have created a sourceforge account to host KGI related resources in
> > > > > > one central point. There is a web-page available at
> > > > > > http://kgi.sourceforge.net/
> > > > >
> > > > > What is the license on KGI-0.9 ? None of the files in the 2000-02-22
> > > > > version contain any license info, except for something nasty looking
> > > > > in the nVidia source, and the files COPYING.[L]GPL in the config
> > > > > directory.
> > > >
> > > > The core and all drivers I have copyright of will be under MIT/X style
> > > > license. The sample implementations (for Linux so far) will be
> > > > just as the target requires.
> > > >
> > > > > KGI used to be under the GPL (IIRC),
> > > >
> > > > The Linux sample implementation, yes. However, if you need a different
> > > > copyright for parts I have written, just ask me what for.
> > > >
> > > > > perhaps now KGI will be under an
> > > > > Xfree style license like LibGGI ?
> > > >
> > > > As said above, KGI itself will/is MIT/X (I am just going through the
> > > > files before moving the CVS-Repository to SourceForge and add a
> > > > copyright notice stating it is under MIT/X license where appropriate.
> > > >
> > > > That's what we agreed on at the last copyright debate.
> > > >
> > >
> > > As Jason did, I too release any and all code I have copyright over in the
> > > KGI tree under the MIT/X license.
> >
> > As do I.
>
> And I if it's still around. Should ask Emanuel too.
>
> Sengan
I hereby release any and all code I have copyright over in the KGI tree,
under the MIT/X license.
--
Emmanuel
