On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:47:15AM +0200, Steffen Seeger wrote:
> > Andrew Apted wrote:
> > >
> > > Steffen Seeger writes:
> > >
> > > > I have created a sourceforge account to host KGI related resources in
> > > > one central point. There is a web-page available at
> > > > http://kgi.sourceforge.net/
> > >
> > > What is the license on KGI-0.9 ? None of the files in the 2000-02-22
> > > version contain any license info, except for something nasty looking
> > > in the nVidia source, and the files COPYING.[L]GPL in the config
> > > directory.
> >
> > The core and all drivers I have copyright of will be under MIT/X style
> > license. The sample implementations (for Linux so far) will be
> > just as the target requires.
> >
> > > KGI used to be under the GPL (IIRC),
> >
> > The Linux sample implementation, yes. However, if you need a different
> > copyright for parts I have written, just ask me what for.
> >
> > > perhaps now KGI will be under an
> > > Xfree style license like LibGGI ?
> >
> > As said above, KGI itself will/is MIT/X (I am just going through the
> > files before moving the CVS-Repository to SourceForge and add a
> > copyright notice stating it is under MIT/X license where appropriate.
> >
> > That's what we agreed on at the last copyright debate.
> >
>
> As Jason did, I too release any and all code I have copyright over in the
> KGI tree under the MIT/X license.
As do I.
Jon
---
'Cloning and the reprogramming of DNA is the first serious step in
becoming one with God.'
- Scientist G. Richard Seed
