Rodolphe Ortalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


> I'm still interested in libxmi, it _may_ save you some time if it can
> provide the software-only rendering routines for free. But, of course, a
> fully new 2D library would be perfect also (but maybe it's a lot of work
> to do the software emulation).
> 
> Rodolphe
> 

So are we. My (small) company is in urgent need to get something working
soon, which gives us 2d functionality like arcs and polygons.
So, the libxmi solution sounds like the most feasible at this point.
And I do not want to do it all on my own.
 

-- 
Thomas Mittelstaedt, software developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to