On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Jon M. Taylor wrote: > Sure. I'll try to collect all the ideas from the mailing list > archives and come up with a proposal over the weekend. Is there still any > interest in the LibXMI idea, or should I assume that we are trying to > design the ideal 2D library from the ground up? (Oops. Once again the last time... :-)) I'm still interested in libxmi, it _may_ save you some time if it can provide the software-only rendering routines for free. But, of course, a fully new 2D library would be perfect also (but maybe it's a lot of work to do the software emulation). Rodolphe
- LibGGI2D - Was: ggi2dDrawArc, ggi2dFillArc Andreas Beck
- Re: LibGGI2D - Was: ggi2dDrawArc, ggi2dFillArc teunis
- Re: LibGGI2D - Was: ggi2dDrawArc, ggi2dFillAr... Jon M. Taylor
- Re: LibGGI2D - Was: ggi2dDrawArc, ggi2dFillArc Jon M. Taylor
- Re: LibGGI2D - Was: ggi2dDrawArc, ggi2dFillAr... Marcus Sundberg
- Re: LibGGI2D - Was: ggi2dDrawArc, ggi2dFillAr... James Simmons
- Re: LibGGI2D - Was: ggi2dDrawArc, ggi2dFillArc Rodolphe Ortalo
- Re: LibGGI2D - Was: ggi2dDrawArc, ggi2dFillAr... Jon M. Taylor
- Re: LibGGI2D - Was: ggi2dDrawArc, ggi2dFillArc Thomas Mittelstaedt
- Re: LibGGI2D - Was: ggi2dDrawArc, ggi2dFillAr... Jon M. Taylor
- Re: LibGGI2D - Was: ggi2dDrawArc, ggi2dFillArc teunis
- Re: LibGGI2D - Was: ggi2dDrawArc, ggi2dFillArc Jon M. Taylor