I've added +1 on the proposal.

I'm still seeing build failures with maven3. Please see the issue.

On 28/06/11 19:49, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I should point out that we should be able to go ahead with the patch and 
> proposal. At this point we have a couple of +1 votes...
>
> - Andrea you indicated enthusiasm but did not vote? Anything to add...
> - Ben how are you set to go on this?
>
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> On Tuesday, 28 June 2011 at 9:02 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
>
> I guess it has to be experiment.
>
> When Hudson runs a deploy job, time-stamped jars will end up in the
> OSGeo repo. We only need to keep the most recent ones since this is
> effectively what we were doing with non-timestamped jars.
>
> As far as I understand from the stackoverflow discussion, the problem,
> if it still exists, affects the local repos of those using an eclipse
> plugin (?). Supposedly, command line maven and (superior) NetBeans
> users won't end up with multiple snapshots in their local repo... but
> there's only one way to find out.
>
> Michael
>
>
> On 28 June 2011 20:39, Jody 
> Garnett<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:
> So Java 6 has gone out; meaning we can take up with maven 3 again.
> So far the interesting question has been with respect to the handling of
> SNAPSHOTS:
> a) Justin will need to ask maven to clear out snapshots after a bit?
> b) Developers should only have one snapshot jar; but there is some
> discussion on if this feature is broken in maven 3 or not
> Comments? Feedback? Experimentation?
> Jody
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Severin (aka 
> Cliff)<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi People,
>
> I've written up a proposal on the wiki with regard to updating the
> GeoTools build process to work under both Maven 2 and 3.
> Justin: jgarnett suggested I open a dialogue with you to see if you have
> any interest in updating the build box to use Maven 3 yet.
> Proposal is
> at http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Update+to+use+Maven+3 for
> review.
>
> Cheers,
> Cliff
> --
> "We are dreamers, shapers, singers and makers..."
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with
> vRanger.
> Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is
> safe,
> secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic?
> Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
Software Engineering Team Leader
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to