So Java 6 has gone out; meaning we can take up with maven 3 again.
So far the interesting question has been with respect to the handling of
SNAPSHOTS:
a) Justin will need to ask maven to clear out snapshots after a bit?
b) Developers should only have one snapshot jar; but there is some
discussion on if this feature is broken in maven 3 or not
Comments? Feedback? Experimentation?
Jody
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Severin (aka Cliff) <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi People,
>
>
> I've written up a proposal on the wiki with regard to updating the GeoTools
> build process to work under both Maven 2 and 3.
>
> Justin: jgarnett suggested I open a dialogue with you to see if you have
> any interest in updating the build box to use Maven 3 yet.
>
> Proposal is at
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Update+to+use+Maven+3 for
> review.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cliff
>
> --
> "We are dreamers, shapers, singers and makers..."
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with
> vRanger.
> Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is
> safe,
> secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic?
> Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
